Easter and Antisemitism

For a month now, God has been telling me to write this blog post. The problem is that the concept behind it is so short, that I haven’t bothered. It’s not “long enough” to be worth the time to write… nor read. But He keeps saying “WRITE IT!” So, in my endeavor to be obedient, here I am. ;)

“The Passion of Christ” is one of those movies that gets good circulation every Easter, and when I see it, I’m always reminded of a heated “discussion” that an actor friend and I had about it when the movie first came out. She argued that it is Anti-Semitic. I argued that it’s not.

Of course the gist of the argument goes like this:

Her: “It blames Jews for killing Jesus.”

Me: “No, it credits certain Hebrews for doing the Will of God.”

Jesus Is Risen

The whole Christian faith hinges on one fact: that Jesus gave himself as The Perfect, Living Sacrifice as an atonement for our sins, then rose from the dead, conquering Death, so that we may have a direct relationship to God, the Father, and have Everlasting Life, with Him in Heaven.

NOTHING else about our faith matters if this did not happen! In order for it to happen, though, He had to have been “sacrificed” first. This implies that He couldn’t die of old age, but had to have been “put to death.” And who would have done that? Who could have done that?

Those who loved & followed Him, surely wouldn’t.

Those who hated Him were too scared of Him to dare to take action to cause harm.

But when we keep in mind that only the people who are closest to us, and have known us most, if not all, our lives, are the very ones who will scoff that we are or could be anything “special”, then we can find those who would and could bring about His death. Luke 19:41-42, Isaiah 53:1, and Isaiah 6:1-4 speak about Israel not believing (as in to recognize or identify) their own. So it had to be the Hebrews who would reject him and have him put to death. They (the Sanhedrin, specifically) couldn’t do it themselves because Pontius Pilate would have had them put to death, too, for the resulting uprising. Not to mention that they were sticklers of the law. (In the interest of time & space, I’ll not get into all the reasons why they couldn’t simply have had him stoned to death themselves, except to say, “That’s not how God wanted it done.”)

So here we are with the fact that, in order for God’s Will to be done, Jesus had to be “killed.” Therefore, there were several people who acted alone (Judas Iscariot) or in groups, as God, Himself, led them to do.

Thus, who’s being Anti-Semitic here? God? The Hebrews themselves? These accusations would be ridiculous. Anyone who says the story of the Crucifixion of Jesus contains Anti-Semitic overtones just does not see the big picture.

Nobody “blames” the Jews for killing Jesus. We recognize that God, Himself, closed their eyes and hardened their hearts to Jesus’s teachings, so that they could and would do what was required of them at that time in history. Thank you, God, for doing so!

What happens when one is considered “fortunate”?

By now everyone’s familiar with the gist of Obama’s plan to address this nations deficit and dire financial circumstances: by raising the taxes on those who are “fortunate.” For the purposes of this post, though, I’m going to set aside the fact that our problem isn’t a revenue issue but a spending issue, and focus solely on the word “fortunate.”

At what point is one considered “fortunate” – financially speaking? Monopoly ManWell, Obama has, in the past used the $250 thousand annual salary as this magical beginning point.

You’ve probably heard numbers thrown around lately giving certain statistics regarding which “fortunate” members of our society pay how much of the total federal revenues received from income taxes. There’s a very good report by The Tax Foundation which uses actual IRS data. It’s pretty easy reading and you can see the numbers for yourself. Here are some points to take note of:

  • In 2008, “the top-earning 5 percent of taxpayers… earned 34.7 percent of the nation’s adjusted gross income, but paid approximately 58.7 percent of federal individual income taxes.”
  • “Overall, these data on high-income tax returns appear to confirm that the recent recession…”, like most recessions, “occurred for the same reason, a sharp decline in income at the high end.”
  • The top 25% of income earners had a sum total AGI (Adjusted Gross Income) of approx $5,678,179 Million (yes, that’s over 5 Trillion) and were taxed at an average of 15.68%, thus paying $890,614 MILLION in taxes. (That would be over $890 Billion dollars. )
  • “… taxpayers with an AGI of $159,619 or more in 2008 constituted the nation’s top 5 percent of income earners. To break into the top 1 percent, a tax return had to have an AGI of $380,354 or more”
  • The top 1% of income earners paid 23.27% of their AGI in taxes. (That would be $88,508.38 out of the $380k quoted above.) Top 5% paid 20.7% of AGI in taxes. (That would be $33,041.13 out of the $159,619 quoted above.)  The top 5-10% paid 12.44%. Top 10-25% paid 9.29%.

Could you imagine having a small business and working your butt off at least 18 hours per day, “24/7/365″ as they say, and having an AGI of  $159 thousand dollars and having to turn around & give $33 thousand to Uncle Sam? OR doing very well, having an AGI of $380 thousand and having to give away $88 thousand of it?!?!?

Did you know that if you win the lottery or report your gambling earnings, the Federal Government will take 40% of those winnings as taxes on “unearned income”? Based on the stats above, the folks who work their butts off to earn that money may as well have been gambling or playing the lottery instead of working hard to make a buck. AND hire employees for good paying jobs. Which would you rather do?

Let’s look at it like this. Most people believe they could live comfortably if they were earning $50,000 annually during their retirement. In order to be earning that much money in interest and dividends – remember you’re not working so you don’t have an “income” – you’d have to have ONE MILLION DOLLARS invested and earning 5% interest (which you just about can’t find any more). Want to be earning $75,000 annually so you could travel and live a life of relative luxury? Then you better have $1.5 Million in those investments earning 5%.

And guess what? You’re still gonna have to pay taxes on that “income” too.

Does any of this sound very “fortunate” to you? And Obama wants to make it worse!