Category Archives: Faith or Christianity

Anything I find worthy of sharing with the world in regards to Faith or Christianity. Yes, I know. It’s uncool and politically incorrect. Didn’t I already say that I’m not PC in my intro?

Easter and Antisemitism

For a month now, God has been telling me to write this blog post. The problem is that the concept behind it is so short, that I haven’t bothered. It’s not “long enough” to be worth the time to write… nor read. But He keeps saying “WRITE IT!” So, in my endeavor to be obedient, here I am. ;)

“The Passion of Christ” is one of those movies that gets good circulation every Easter, and when I see it, I’m always reminded of a heated “discussion” that an actor friend and I had about it when the movie first came out. She argued that it is Anti-Semitic. I argued that it’s not.

Of course the gist of the argument goes like this:

Her: “It blames Jews for killing Jesus.”

Me: “No, it credits certain Hebrews for doing the Will of God.”

Jesus Is Risen

The whole Christian faith hinges on one fact: that Jesus gave himself as The Perfect, Living Sacrifice as an atonement for our sins, then rose from the dead, conquering Death, so that we may have a direct relationship to God, the Father, and have Everlasting Life, with Him in Heaven.

NOTHING else about our faith matters if this did not happen! In order for it to happen, though, He had to have been “sacrificed” first. This implies that He couldn’t die of old age, but had to have been “put to death.” And who would have done that? Who could have done that?

Those who loved & followed Him, surely wouldn’t.

Those who hated Him were too scared of Him to dare to take action to cause harm.

But when we keep in mind that only the people who are closest to us, and have known us most, if not all, our lives, are the very ones who will scoff that we are or could be anything “special”, then we can find those who would and could bring about His death. Luke 19:41-42, Isaiah 53:1, and Isaiah 6:1-4 speak about Israel not believing (as in to recognize or identify) their own. So it had to be the Hebrews who would reject him and have him put to death. They (the Sanhedrin, specifically) couldn’t do it themselves because Pontius Pilate would have had them put to death, too, for the resulting uprising. Not to mention that they were sticklers of the law. (In the interest of time & space, I’ll not get into all the reasons why they couldn’t simply have had him stoned to death themselves, except to say, “That’s not how God wanted it done.”)

So here we are with the fact that, in order for God’s Will to be done, Jesus had to be “killed.” Therefore, there were several people who acted alone (Judas Iscariot) or in groups, as God, Himself, led them to do.

Thus, who’s being Anti-Semitic here? God? The Hebrews themselves? These accusations would be ridiculous. Anyone who says the story of the Crucifixion of Jesus contains Anti-Semitic overtones just does not see the big picture.

Nobody “blames” the Jews for killing Jesus. We recognize that God, Himself, closed their eyes and hardened their hearts to Jesus’s teachings, so that they could and would do what was required of them at that time in history. Thank you, God, for doing so!

Federal Budget Proposal

This was an email received from my dad. I usually delete such things, especially since what it proposes is so obviously “out there” & would never happen – thus it’s really no more than tongue-in-cheek humor. BUT it also hits so close to the truth of the issue hat I couldn’t resist posting.

When a company falls on difficult times, one of the things that seems to happen is they reduce their staff and workers.  The remaining workers need to find ways to continue to do a good job or risk that their job would be eliminated as well.  Wall street, and the media normally congratulate the CEO for making this type of “tough decision”, and his board of directors gives him a big bonus.congress

Our government should not be immune from similar risks.

Therefore: Reduce the House of Representatives from the current 435 members to 218 members and Senate members from 100 to 50 (one per State). Also reduce remaining staff by 25%.

Accomplish this over the next 8 years. (two steps / two elections) and of course this would require some redistricting.

Some Yearly Monetary Gains Include:

$44,108,400 for elimination of base pay for congress. (267 members X $165,200 pay / member / yr.)

pinkslip$97,175,000 for elimination of the above people’s staff. (estimate $1.3 Million in staff per each member of the House, and $3 Million in staff per each member of the Senate every year)

$240,294 for the reduction in remaining staff by 25%.

$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork barrel ear-marks each year. (Those members whose jobs are gone. Current estimates for total government pork earmarks are at $15 Billion / yr)

The remaining representatives would need to work smarter and would need to improve efficiencies. It might even be in their best interests to work together for the good of our country? (Now there’s a new idea!)

We may also expect that smaller committees might lead to a more efficient resolution of issues as well. It might even be easier to keep track of what your representative is doing.

Congress has more tools available to do their jobs than it had back in 1911 when the current number of representatives was established.  (telephone, computers, cell phones to name a few).

Note:

Congress did not hesitate to head home when it was a holiday, when the nation needed a real fix to the economic problems.  Also, we have  senators that have not been doing their jobs for the past 18+ months (on the campaign trail) and still they all have been accepting full pay.  These facts alone support a reduction in senators & congress.

Summary of opportunity:

$44,108,400 reduction of congress members.

$282,100, 000 for elimination of the reduced house member staff.

$150,000,000 for elimination of reduced senate member staff.

$59,675,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining house members.

$37,500,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining senate members.

$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork added to bills by the reduction of congress members.

$8,073,383,400 per year, estimated total savings. (That’s 8-BILLION just to start!)

Big business does these types of cuts all the time.

If Congresspersons were required to serve 20, 25 or 30 years (like everyone else) in order to collect retirement benefits there is no telling h ow much we would save. Currently they get full retirement after serving only ONE term.